In the Design-Build construction methodology tasks are completed in overlapping fashion, like beginning construction while still designing the building. The comparison between software development and physical construction has often been used to argue against agile development practices in that “you can’t just add another story on a skyscraper”. Adding another story to a skyscraper might be a little tough, but finishing off the design by reacting on feedback of what has already been built is not too far off.
One of the key concepts of agile development is turning the agile triangle upside down. That means instead of starting off with a fixed set of features in a requirement specification (scope), instead the budget and time is locked. It seems this is also the case with Design-Build:
- Wikipedia: Design-Build“Almost 70% of traditional contracts end up over budget, compared to D&B which is only around 25-30% over budget. The overage of a D&B project is generally owner driven, whereas the overage in the more traditional method tends to be a result of the budget disconnect to which many architects and other design professionals are prone.”

Online OSHA Training
18 Oct, 2009
Thanks for sharing the wiki link regarding Design-Build ..
logo design
5 Nov, 2009
Good to read about this i was searching about agile development
canadian
6 Dec, 2009
Agile development very nice
招聘
4 Jan, 2010
Good to read about this i was searching about agile development
Correctional Healthcare
6 Jan, 2010
You’ll definitely receive some very response on this article, it won’t surprise me if your article is bookmarked in huge numbers. :)
广告联盟
17 Feb, 2010
Good to read about this i was
シティゴールドカード
29 Mar, 2010
You’ll definitely receive some very response on this article, it won’t surprise me if your article is bookmarked in huge numbers. :)
中国求人
30 Mar, 2010
Many thanks for putting your list together. It’s very re