The 7 deadly sins of user research

Conference talk at Northern User Experience
· 35 min

David Travis, who holds a PhD in psychology and has published two books on usability, compares the user researcher to an investigative journalist in this talk from Northern User Experience 2014. Both look for stories that capture one person’s goals, motivations and struggles while resonating with a much larger audience. Both try to find the truth in contradictory accounts, and both deal with unreliable witnesses: people who don’t understand why they do what they do, don’t want to say, or don’t tell the whole truth.

Yet many design teams still approach user research naively. They ask people what they want and believe the answers. They start with a hidden agenda, cherry-pick findings and tell senior management what it wants to hear. Or they let one person become the sole repository of research knowledge and fail to build a user-centred culture.

David has seen these mistakes in start-ups and established firms, in public and private sector organisations, and in both waterfall and agile teams. Alongside the sins, he suggests how to avoid them on your own projects.

What you'll learn

  • Why user research resembles investigative journalism
  • Why asking people what they want, and believing them, misleads teams
  • How hidden agendas and cherry-picked findings undermine research
  • Why one person holding all research knowledge blocks a user-centred culture
  • How to avoid these mistakes on your own projects
David Travis
1 conference talk · See speaker profile

Watch next

Free weekly newsletter

Real UI patterns and design psychology in your inbox

Learn how successful products use UI patterns and behavioral design. One email a week from UI-Patterns.com and Learning Loop.

Subscribe

More talks on Design