Rule Builder
Design Pattern
Join the early bird Black Friday list
Black Friday is just around the corner, and we’re excited to offer early access to our best deals of the year at shop.learningloop.io. If you’re looking to elevate your brainstorming sessions and streamline your team’s workflow, our printed card decks are here to help.
Want to get in before everyone else?
Join our Black Friday Early Bird list to be the first to know when
discounts go live! We’re launching the sale early this year, so you
can grab your deck and start putting it to use before 2025 even begins.
Alternate titles: Query Builder, Smart Filter, Segment Builder.
Problem summary
The user needs to, often repeatedly, conduct a search query based on a custom set of rules
Example
Usage
- Use to build a search query based on several conditions
- Use to save a segment rather than static selection
- Use to help users build dynamic lists, making the selected rules static rather than the actual search result
- Use when a search query involves an unknown number of undefined conditions
- Do not use when users can find what they need using only a text input.
- Do not use when the type of search query requires the same types of variables to be chosen every single time.
More examples
Solution
Let the user build a dynamic list of rules to narrow down matching results from a dataset. Each rule is represented by a separate line or box and divided from each other vertically.
Any or all
The user must specify whether a rule is needed (AND) or is optional (OR). A common approach to simplify the implementation of this pattern is to provide an option to choose whether all rules chosen should be matched – or just any of the rules.
A more nuanced approach is to allow each rule to be a required match or just an optional match.
Treat each rule type differently?
As the user choses the kind of rule he or she wants to impose, those rules can have very different impacts on what corresponding data needs to be entered for the rule to give meaning.
This is why many rule builders provide smart mini-forms that vary depending on what kind of rule is selected. One rule might impose a text search, wherein options like “contains”, “does not contain”, “matches”, or “do not match” make sense. Other rules could be to select an option from a dynamic list or to provide numeric- or range inputs.
Adding and removing rules
The smartest feature rule builders provide is to dynamically add and remove rules.
The “Add” button is typically located either directly under the rules and remains so as new rules are added or removed, or it located alongside the remove rule button. In the case of the latter, this allows for new rules to be inserted directly beneath a desired rule.
Removing a rule is most often allowed at the beginning or end of the line the rule is presented on.
Rationale
A rule builder allows a user to specify unique conditions to discover and group items across one or more datasets.
The results returned by an active rule can be dynamic in nature as its related datasets change over time. An active rule can trigger a set of actions to be performed when the conditions, criteria and values of the rule are met. Rules sets can be grouped into discrete units and linked together with condition logic to create highly complex rule conditions.
Discussion
Pattern authors
1 UI design for rule builder by Two Rivers Consulting
2 Interesting StackExchange discussion
More examples of the Rule Builder pattern See all 6 example screenshots
User Interface Design Patterns
- Forms
- Explaining the process
- Community driven
- Tabs
- Jumping in hierarchy
- Menus
- Content
- Gestures
- Tables
- Formatting data
- Images
- Search
- Reputation
- Social interactions
- Shopping
- Increasing frequency
- Guidance
- Registration
Persuasive Design Patterns
- Loss Aversion
- Other cognitive biases
- Scarcity
- Gameplay design
- Fundamentals of rewards
- Gameplay rewards